Quantcast
Channel: Samuel Bagenstos – SCOTUSblog
Browsing latest articles
Browse All 8 View Live

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

Argument preview: “Changing clothes” and overtime pay

Samuel Bagenstos is a Professor of Law at the University of Michigan Law School. What constitutes “changing clothes”?  A simple question, perhaps, but one the Court is poised to decide in Sandifer v....

View Article



Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

Argument recap: A victory for the ordinary meaning of “clothes”?

In Monday’s argument in Sandifer v. United States Steel Corporation, counsel for both the employee-plaintiffs and the employer-defendant offered the Court tests for defining what constitutes “changing...

View Article

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

Opinion analysis: “Clothes” are items commonly regarded as articles of dress

Often, the Supreme Court’s Justices don’t reveal their views of a case at oral argument.  But sometimes, oral argument tells you everything you need to know. When the Court heard argument in November...

View Article

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

Harris v. Quinn Symposium: The coming conflict in public employee speech law...

What most people will take away from Harris v. Quinn is what the Court did not decide.  Although the petitioners asked the Court to overrule its 1977 decision in Abood v. Detroit Board of Education...

View Article
Browsing latest articles
Browse All 8 View Live


Latest Images